Skip to content
  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes
Asymmetric Leadership - Tuesday, April 28th, 2026
  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes

Asymmetric Leadership

DEFENCES AGAINST ANXIETY ARE DEFENCES AGAINST INNOVATION

  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes

Distinguishing active from passive users

by philipjboxer on December 21, 2006April 22, 2026

by Philip Boxer The different kinds of value proposition at the edge involve different kinds of relationship to the user as follows 1: With r-type propositions, there is no relationship to the user’s situation, the…

rcKP – value propositions at the edge

by philipjboxer on December 21, 2006April 22, 2026

by Philip Boxer
Different kinds of service are described, depending on the way in which a customer chooses to internalise or externalise its learning as it responds to its own value deficit.

Modelling structure-determining processes

by philipjboxer on December 19, 2006December 4, 2022

by Philip Boxer
In modelling structure-determined processes, we can take the ‘vertical’ axis as a given, and elaborate the ‘horizontal’ within its terms. But in structure-determining processes, we have to start with the particular ‘horizontal’ relations to context-of-use, and then examine the ways in which they are supported and/or restricted by the ‘vertical’ axis.

Finding the edge

by philipjboxer on December 14, 2006December 4, 2022

by Philip Boxer
In the blog on East-West Dominance, we talked about taking power to the edge, but where is this ‘edge’? Where is it? This is a question of what forms of competitive advantage the organisation can create.

What do we need to learn about complex systems?

by philipjboxer on December 13, 2006April 10, 2020

by Philip Boxer
We need to learn about how to model the structure-determining processes of the organisation-in-context as well as the structure-determined processes of the systems the organisation uses.

Two-Sided Markets

by RichardV on November 11, 2006December 4, 2022

by Richard Veryard
In his HBS March interview, Andrei Hagiu identifies Wal-Mart as an example of an organization that is transforming from a traditional merchant into a two-sided platform. Let’s look at the (asymmetric) structure of this transformation.

Creating Economies of Alignment

by philipjboxer on October 27, 2006April 4, 2020

by Philip Boxer
As we develop our understanding of the three asymmetries, it is helpful to associate them with three corresponding forms of economy that their management generates.

The Faustian Pact

by philipjboxer on April 7, 2006August 14, 2023

by Philip Boxer North-South dominance works when the environment can be assumed to be symmetrical to North’s assumptions about it. As the variety of actual demands on the organization increase, making this assumption increasingly less…

Must we fall into the vortex?

by philipjboxer on April 6, 2006October 31, 2022

by Philip Boxer
A turbulent environment is one that has a life of its own that can no longer be ignored by the organisation, i.e. it becomes asymmetric in a way that cannot be ignored. A vortex is what happens when organisations are not willing or able to adapt to this environment – they continue to ignore it, not because it is not there, but because they have no way of responding to it.
Must we then fall ultimately into this vortex? It depends on whether we can find it within ourselves to take up the double challenge these environments pose to our identities.

East-West Dominance

by philipjboxer on April 6, 2006December 4, 2022

by Philip Boxer
East-West dominance requires networked forms of organisation that can hold ‘the edge’ accountable for the way it uses the resources of the supporting organisation, but in relation to the situation in which the demand is arising. This contrasts with the hierarchical forms associated with N-S dominance. What is at stake is the performativity of what is done in relation to the demand at the edge, rather than the performance of what is done against centrally (symmetrically) defined criteria. It is not that hierarchy isn’t still necessary, but rather that it has to be situationally rather than universally defined.

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 … Page 22

© 2018 Boxer Research Limited.

Recent Posts

  • What more can corporations do for citizens
  • Wanted, organizations not dead but alive
  • The need for a psychodynamics of libidinal economies
  • Overcoming the counter-resistance of sponsoring systems
  • The Doubling of the Double Task
  • The regulation of ecosystems under different forms of governmentality
  • The ‘Value Stairs’ and the ‘Double Diamond’
  • The behavioral strategies of symbionts
  • Balancing normative and ‘edge’ roles in turbulent environments
  • Triple articulation and the quadripod of a living system

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2026 Asymmetric Leadership. All Rights Reserved.
Cassions Theme by FRT