Skip to content
  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes
Asymmetric Leadership - Tuesday, September 26th, 2023
  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes

Asymmetric Leadership

DEFENCES AGAINST ANXIETY ARE DEFENCES AGAINST INNOVATION

  • Boxer Research Limited
  • BRL Publications
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Toolsets
    • Critik
    • PAN Projective Analysis Tools
    • Workbook Processes

Category: Stratification

The layering of the relationship between supply and asymmetric forms of demand.

On being edge-driven: outside is inside

by philipjboxer on September 6, 2016July 30, 2018

by Philip Boxer BSc MBA PhD We have seen in distinguishing task systems, sentient organisation and sovereignty that an enterprise with supply-side sovereignty has no difficulty establishing its boundary or perimeter as an ‘open system’.  Furthermore,…

Stratifying relations of novel emergence subject to supply-side sovereignty: r-type and c-type propositions

by philipjboxer on September 1, 2016August 7, 2018

by Philip Boxer BSc MBA PhD In distinguishing emergence from hierarchy, the stratified relation of novel emergence was described of a product produced from underlying component technologies.  This relation was linked to the first asymmetric dilemma…

On stratification

by philipjboxer on August 28, 2014July 30, 2018

by Philip Boxer PhD Why the interest in stratification? A colleague, Simon Western, referred me recently to Actor-Network Theory and the work of Bruno Latour in the context of a conversation about the behaviour of…

Describing what is going on (wigo)

by philipjboxer on April 16, 2012December 4, 2022

by Philip Boxer BSc MBA PhD The case of the Homeless Charity uses a 4-quadrant/4-colour model for describing the ‘being’ of the enterprise.  What does this mean? The behaviour of the enterprise reveals assumptions that are…

The strategy ceiling

by philipjboxer on July 30, 2011January 15, 2023

by Philip Boxer It is only with the full relational form that the ethos of action learning has to pervade the enterprise as a whole. Up to that point, the assumption the enterprise makes is…

Why is a stratification not a universal hierarchy?

by philipjboxer on January 30, 2007August 8, 2018

by Philip Boxer
By including the third asymmetry, stratification can no longer take the form of a universal hierarchy, but instead must be particular to the relationship to demand. It is this which presents the business with its double challenge.

The three asymmetries

by RichardV on January 1, 2006April 2, 2020

by Richard Veryard
This post provides a brief explanation of the three asymmetries, extracted from our Microsoft Architecture Journal article.

© 2018 Boxer Research Limited.

Recent Posts

  • How does 21st century capitalism differ from 20th century capitalism?
  • Limitations with Viable Systems Modeling
  • The dialectics implied by the Q-sectors
  • The contribution of the Q-sectors to GDP
  • Accelerating demand tempos and the double-V cycle
  • Digitalization of the economy presents leadership with a third dilemma
  • Sustaining Requisite Ecosystemic Agility in the face of accelerating demand tempos
  • Why three kinds of symmetry-breaking?
  • Relational Architecture
  • The relationship of Conceptual or Structural modeling to other types of modeling approach

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2023 Asymmetric Leadership. All Rights Reserved.
Cassions Theme by FRT